CONJOINT ANALYSIS TUTORIAL
The Basics of Conjoint Analysis
The basics of conjoint analysis are easy to understand. It should only take about 20 minutes to introduce this topic so you can appreciate what conjoint analysis has to offer.
In order to understand conjoint analysis, let's look at a simple example. Suppose you wanted to book an airline flight and you had a choice of spending $400 or $700 for a ticket. If this were the only consideration then the choice is clear: the lower priced ticket is preferable. What if the only consideration in booking a flight was sitting in a regular or extra-wide seat? If seat size was the only consideration then you would probably prefer an extra-wide seat. Finally, suppose you can take either a direct flight which takes three hours or a flight that stops once and takes five hours. Virtually everyone would prefer the direct flight.
In a real purchase situation, however, consumers do not make choices based on a single attribute like comfort. Consumers examine a range of features or attributes and then make judgements or trade-offs to determine their final purchase choice. Conjoint analysis examines these trade-offs to determine the combination of attributes that will be most satisfying to the consumer. In other words, by using conjoint analysis a company can determine the optimal features for their product or service. In addition, conjoint analysis will identify the best advertising message by identifying the features that are most important in product choice.
In sum, the value of conjoint analysis is that it predicts what products or services people will choose and assesses the weight people give to various factors that underlie their decisions. As such, it is one of the most powerful, versatile and strategically important research techniques available.
A Practical Example of Conjoint Analysis
Conjoint analysis presents choice alternatives between products/services defined by sets of attributes. This is illustrated by the following choice: would you prefer a flight with regular seats, that costs $400 and takes 5 hours, or a flight which costs $700, has extra-wide seats and takes 3 hours? Extending this, we see that if seat comfort, price and duration are the only relevant attributes, there are potentially eight flight choices.
| Choice |
Seat Comfort |
Price |
Duration |
| 1 |
extra-wide |
$700 |
5 hours |
| 2 |
extra-wide |
$700 |
3 hours |
| 3 |
extra-wide |
$400 |
5 hours |
| 4 |
extra-wide |
$400 |
3 hours |
| 5 |
regular |
$700 |
5 hours |
| 6 |
regular |
$700 |
3 hours |
| 7 |
regular |
$400 |
5 hours |
| 8 |
regular |
$400 |
3 hours |
Given the above alternatives, product 4 is very likely the most
preferred choice while product 5 is probably the least preferred product. The
preference for the other choices is determined by what is important to that
individual.
Conjoint analysis can be used to determine the relative importance
of each attribute, attribute level, and combinations of attributes. If the most
preferable product is not feasible for some reason (perhaps the airline simply
cannot provide extra-wide seats and a 3 hour arrival time at a price of $400)
then the conjoint analysis will identify the next most preferred alternative.
If you have other information on travelers, such as background demographics,
you might be able to identify market segments for which distinct products may
be appealing. For example, the business traveller and the vacation traveller
may have very different preferences which could be met by distinct flight offerings.
You can now see the value of conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis
allows the researcher to examine the trade-offs that people make in purchasing
a product. This allows the researcher to design products/services that will
be most appealing to a specific market. In addition, because conjoint analysis
identifies important attributes, it can be used to create advertising messages
that will be most persuasive.
In evaluating products, consumers will always make trade-offs.
A traveller may like the comfort and arrival time of a particular flight, but
reject purchase due to the cost. In this case, cost has a high utility value.
Utility can be defined as a number which represents the value that consumers
place on an attribute. In other words, it represents the relative "worth"
of the attribute. A low utility indicates less value; a high utility indicates
more value.
The following figure presents a list of hypothetical utilities
for an individual consumer:
| Duration |
Utility |
| 3 hours |
42 |
| 5 hours |
22 |
| Comfort |
Utility |
| extra-wide seats |
15 |
| regular seats |
12 |
| Cost |
Utility |
| $400 |
61 |
| $700 |
5 |
Based on these utilities, we can make the following conclusions:
- This consumer places a greater value on a 3 hour flight (the utility is
42) than on a 5 hour flight (utility is 22).
This consumer does not differ much in the value that he or she places on comfort.
That is, the utilities are quite close (12 vs. 15).
- This consumer places a much higher value on a price of $400 than a price
of $700.
- The preceding example depicts an individual's utilities. Average utilities
can be calculated for all consumers or for specific subgroups of consumers.
These utilities also tell us the extent to which each of these
attributes drives the decision to choose a particular flight. The importance
of an attribute can be calculated by examining the range of utilities (that
is, the difference between the lowest and highest utilities) across all levels
of the attribute. That range represents the maximum impact that the attribute
can contribute to a product.
Using the hypothetical utilities presented earlier, we can calculate
the relative importance of each of the three attributes. The range for each
attribute is given below:
- Duration: Range = 20 (42-22)
- Comfort : Range = 3 (15-12)
- Cost : Range = 56 (61-5)
These ranges tell us the relative importance of each attribute.
Cost is the most important factor in product purchase as it has the highest
range of utility values. Cost is followed in importance by the duration of the
flight. Based on the range and value of the utilities, we can see that seat
comfort is relatively unimportant to this consumer. Therefore, advertising which
emphasizes seat comfort would be ineffective. This person will make his or her
purchase choice based mainly on cost and then on the duration of the flight.
Marketers can use the information from utility values to design
products and/or services which come closest to satisfying important consumer
segments. Conjoint analysis will identify the relative contributions of each
feature to the choice process. This technique, therefore, can be used to identify
market opportunities by exploring the potential of product feature combinations
that are not currently available.
Choice Simulations
In addition to providing information on the importance of product
features, conjoint analysis provides the opportunity to conduct computer choice
simulations. Choice simulations reveal consumer preference for specific products
defined by the researcher. In this case, simulations will identify successful
and unsuccessful flight packages before they are introduced to the market!
For example, let's say that the researcher defined three flights
as follows:
| Flight 1: |
$300 |
5 hours |
two stops |
meal |
| Flight 2: |
$400 |
4 hours |
one stop |
snack |
| Flight 3: |
$500 |
3 hours |
direct |
no meal |
The conjoint simulation will indicate the percentage of consumers
that prefer each of the three flights. The simulation might show that consumers
are willing to travel longer if they can pay less and are provided a meal. Simulations
allow the researcher to estimate preference, sales and share for new flights
before they come to market.
Simulations can be done interactively on a microcomputer to quickly
and easily look at all possible options. The researcher may, for example, want
to determine if a price change of $50, $100, or $150 will influence consumer's
choice. Also, conjoint will let the researcher look at interactions among attributes.
For example, consumers may be willing to pay $50 more for a flight on the condition
that they are provided with a hot meal rather than a snack.
Data Collection
In order to conduct a conjoint analysis, information must be collected
from a sample of consumers. This data can be conveniently collected in locations
such as shopping centres or by the Internet. In the previous example, data collection
could take place at a booth located in an airport or in the office of a travel
agent.
A sample size of 400 is generally sufficient to provide reliable
data for consumer products or services. Data collection involves showing respondents
a series of cards that contain a written description of the product or service.
If a consumer product is being tested then a picture of the product can be included
along with a written description. A typical card examining the business traveller
might look like the following:
|
"On your next business flight overseas, how likely would you be
to choose a flight that has all the following characteristics? Please
circle the appropriate number from 1 to 10 to indicate your feelings."
- one stop en route
- extra-wide seats
- Departure time: before 8:00 am
- "double" mileage points
- $200 fee to change ticket
|
| Would never choose this flight |
|
|
Would definitely choose this flight |
|
|
|
Readers might be worried at this point about the total number of
cards that need to be rated by a single respondent. Fortunately, we are able
to use statistical manipulations to cut down on the number of cards. In a typical
conjoint study, respondents only need to rate between 10-20 cards.
This data would be input to the conjoint analysis. Utilities can
then be calculated and simulations can be performed to identify which products
will be successful and which should be changed. Price simulations can also be
conducted to determine sensitivity of the consumer to changes in prices.