PLAYING TO THE END GAME
Making strategic choices with complex
market dynamics

Marketing in India, with its economic and social contrasts, is
often likened to dealing with several markets at the same time. The population
of more than 1 billion differs enormously with 15 different languages, social
customs and live under varying states of economic development from the vastly
affluent to the destitute.
The personal and general insurance market, hitherto dominated by
governmental monopolistic monoliths - Life Insurance Corporation, General Insurance
- had to make way for a slew of private players who paired with local financial
institutions to revolutionize the insurance market in India.
This paper describes the initiatives adopted by ING Vysya life
insurance to provide a distinctive and compelling brand experience to consumers.
All this had became possible by understanding behavior dynamics, need states,
creating rapid segmentation models and developing value-based offerings and
services to re design their own product life cycles.
BACKGROUND:
THE INSURANCE MARKET - THE LIFE OF THE PARTY
2000 AD: Entry of private players:
In 2000 the government passed a resolution that enabled private
participation in the financial services sector in India.
At the time ING VYSYA and other multinational insurance companies
entered the country, the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and The General insurance
Corporation (GIC) were forces to reckon with. With a large force of nearly 2,000
branches and 500,000 sales agents LIC seemed formidable with almost 190 million
policies outstanding.
These Indian companies offered plain vanilla policies with no returns.
The premia was paid for 'protection', and insurance was usually purchased as
a tax saving tool. It was considered essentially a rite of passage for a male
who had entered the workforce - a veritable reassurance of self worth!
Despite the impressive statistics, insurance premia paid accounted
for 2.3% of the total GDP.
The Socio /Psychographic Trends at the Time
of Entry
Several demographic and psychographic megatrends augured well for
the growth of financial services in general and insurance in particular.
One was the fact that there was a substantial segment of the middle
class population that remained 'unbanked' (40%) and penetration of insurance
was only 13% of the total insurable population!
Besides this, economic growth at 6.5% and the 'demographic dividend'
- 55% of the population in the productive age group of 15 - 60 years were clear
indications for exponential growth.
The Prevalent Inner Mindscape
A key enabler of the psychographic mega trends was the ratcheting
up of incomes' and the emergence of the 'new affluent class'.
Table 1
NCAER REPORT
Consumer classes
(Annual income in $) |
1996 millions |
2001 |
2007 |
% change (approx) |
The Rich
($ 5k and above) |
1.2 |
2.0 |
6.2 |
416% |
The Consuming Class
($ 1.5k - 5k ) |
32.5 |
54.6 |
90.9 |
179% |
The Climbers
($ 0.75k - 1.5k) |
54.1 |
71.6 |
74.1 |
37% |
The Aspirants
($ 0.375k - 0.750k) |
44 |
28.1 |
15.3 |
-65% |
The Destitute
(Less than 0.375k) |
33 |
23.4 |
12.8 |
-61% |
The expectations of the people have become more distilled as a
result of the growing incomes. The growth in incomes was to the tune of:
- Deprived class: 11.0% growth
- Lower and Middle: 6.0%
- Upper Middle: 10.0%
- Upper Class: 21.5%
The other forces that fuelled a paradigm shift in the expectations
and the world view of consumers towards all products and services including
insurance were:
- Growth in sheer sizes of the spending classes and increased purchasing
power clamoring for the good things in life (spending classes comprised over
300 million) and were getting 'aspirational';
- Increasing exposure of the average Indian to better lifestyles of the west
through media and product usage as well as through foreign travel;
- Emergence of new categories like mobile phones, digital camera phones and
convergence technology creating new frames of reference for the aspiring classes
(these impacted expectations of consumers even in financial products).
These and similar factors went a long way in shaping expectations
of consumers by engendering cross category comparisons.
INSURANCE INDUSTRY MANTRA:
NEED TO RE-INVENT THE RULES OF THE GAME
"The art of strategy is to foresee the inevitable and expedite
its occurrence"
Charles Maurice Talleyrand
Within a year or two the interplay of market forces and the marketing
efforts of the players has resulted in a convergence of financial products which
broke traditional boundaries that existed between safety, liquidity and high
return products.
Life investment companies, reinsurers, asset managers, investment
bankers, and private bankers all find themselves competing in the same arena
for business not always traditionally regarded as insurance.
Therefore, the life insurance industry, in order to grow the market
needed to innovate insurance offerings, channels, take aggressive stances through
tying up with credible regional banks, re-craft the delivery channels and create
interesting bouquets of offerings to be injected at various inflection points
in the product lifecycle.
ING Vysya instituted a "Brand Experience Process" dubbed "Live
the brand" to understand and innovate their offerings.
This is a holistic approach that defines the environment in the
competitive sphere and understands the messages and experience the consumer
is exposed to both from within the product/service category as well as across
categories. Market Research has been at the core of all these processes. Innovations
have also been made in the product delivery pathways and the 're-invention of
the role of the advisor'. These lessons are being replicated in other emerging
markets too where ING has a presence.
LIVE THE BRAND - THE BRAND EXPERIENCE
STORY
The key highlight of these strategies has been to use customer
equity as a framework for generating value and equity (and not vice versa!)
These strategies include unique ways of:
- Understanding the behavioral economics/dynamics of consumers and the triggers
for behavior through use of proprietary techniques like Discovery
- Developing rapid stage segmentation strategies
- Creating a bouquet of offerings to meet and surpass expectations and add
value in the business system
- Amoebic mutations - Recrafting the offerings at various inflection points
in the product life cycle to provide a total brand value experience.
Stage 1: Assimilation
Success factors: Understanding consumer
expectations and market behavior dynamics
An initial comprehensive study of the usage and attitudes towards
insurance revealed interesting perceptions and attitude segments!
- To succeed, private players needed to ride piggyback on a strong local bank
(Bank assurance). The bank then provided the source of credibility. In this
case Vysya Bank, with high credibility among consumers, provided the cover.
- In terms of risk attitudes, distinct trends emerged.
- The defensive investors were the largest kind (60%). They preferred safe
long-term returns guaranteed by the government as well as gold, especially
the elders. These were also among the higher SEC segments likeA1.
- There was a small segment of Sophisticated investors (34%) who actually
took professional advise from portfolio managers and were even predisposed
to taking calculated risks - i.e., mutual funds, equity markets. These were
typically those who had accumulated a fair share of wealth and were not insecure
about making it work for them!
- There was also a Young Cosmopolitan (Yo Co) segment (6%). The YoCos were
highly 'self opinionated’ and demanded a higher life cover. They were keen
to be educated on the financial aspects of investing in local and foreign
markets. They were largely neophytes in the arena of investments.
- Across board consumers expected a reasonable return for their investments
and the time span for returns seemed to telescope dramatically. Consumers
wanted some returns to accrue within four to five years of entering an insurance
policy.
- For the private players the expectations were more stringent! They were
expected to start paying up from a reasonably short time frame of four years
for consumers to feel reassured about their long term probity and safety of
the capital!
Figure 1
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CLUSTERS
| Defensive Investors |
Sophisticates |
Young Cosmopolitans |
- High self esteem
- Believes in planning for today as well as tomorrow
- Cautious in investments
- Careful spender
- Believing in living and ageing gracefully
- Is led by recommendations of professionals/advisors
|
- Self reliant
- Affluent(has a well paying job/business)
- High taste for life
- Does not compromise on lifestyle and status
- Leaves nothing to chance
- Believes in making money work hard for him
|
- Not worried about future
- Stylish
- Wants to try all latest fads
- Brand/label conscious
- Will not compromise on brand name
- enjoys life to the brim
- Believes in globalization and development
- Has a high ego
|
Service delivery pathways
Many consumers, especially the Sophisticates and the YoCos, had
begun using remote channels like the Internet and media/ toll free lines for
data gathering and comparison of insurance schemes.
- As a re-invention and not elimination of the traditional pathways, the
role of the advisor was also critical! They almost revealed a 'god like’
devotion in his advise. The sophisticates had become professional enough
to reveal a reliance on professional advisors - who could be the bank manager,
portfolio manager, celebrity stock brokers - essentially people who could
look at financial planning holistically and give recommendations.
- Shopping around was not the norm! Most evaluated only one or two policies
only before making a decision.
- Interestingly, price sensitivity was not high. The recommendation of the
advisor seemed to make the difference between policies.
At the end of this stage, it was evident that the market was
capable of absorbing several types of policies which would need to be carefully
crafted and evolved keeping the needs of each segment in mind.
Stage 2: Synthesis
Success factors: Focusing on customer
equity as a driver to brand equity through rapid need state analysis, concept
generation ...
In order to understand consumer equity, a large segmentation
and cluster study based on life stages and market dynamics/behavior mapping
was conducted. This study innovatively meshed the socio-demo and psychographics
variables with the lifestage need states of consumers! This was done through
using a proprietary model called "Discovery".
Based on their financial investment portfolios and attitudes
/expectations from insurance, five distinct clusters emerged. The key clusters
identified for which distinct value offerings were to be offered were:
- High Net Worth Buyers (16%) - more predisposed to traditional offerings
and mutual funds;
- The Defensive Buyers (48%) - who keep their income in government assured
stocks, liquid forms of investments;
- The Sophisticates (18%) - predisposed towards mutual funds, stocks through
portfolio managers;
- The Pension Savers (12%) - older, more disposed towards safe bonds, traditional
offerings, providing income in later years;
- The Neophytes (6%) - those just starting out, willing to look at nontraditional
offerings with safety, unit linked plans.
Figure 2
MARKET STRUCTURE: CLUSTERS

A few of the reigning attitudes to investments and insurance
are captured here in table 2 below.
Table 2
ATTITUDE TO INSURANCE
5 point scale
(mean scores) |
High net worth buyers
16% |
Defensive buyers
48% |
Sophisticates
18% |
Pension Savers
12% |
Neophytes
6% |
| Prefer to invest in policies recommended
by the advisors |
3.88 |
4.3 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
| Prefer governmentbacked funds |
2.88 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
3.5 |
| Prefer other assets like gold |
3.28 |
4.2 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
| Want company with variety of flexible
plans |
3.98 |
3.4 |
4.3 |
3.0 |
4.5 |
| Want returns on the investment with
life cover |
4.08 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
| Want the company to be proactive and
offer regular updates and suggestions |
4.78 |
3.8 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
3.4 |
Stage 3: Value Creation and Dedication
Success factors: Customer needs formed
the basis of the product plans and various value propositions were created
and longitudinally re framed and evolved.
These value propositions were arrived at after extensive
qualitative as well as quantitative concept and need states research and
understanding the preferences of the clusters.

Value Proposition 1: Insurance to
cover future cash needs
These policies were called Reassuring Life and were aimed
at covering the predictable /planned future needs as well as provide for
unpredictable needs of money.
These essentially comprised endowment as well as unit linked
policies aimed at the Neophyte and the Pension Savers segment.
These schemes offered higher protection and regular money
flows.
These were focused savings plans which provided extra earning
opportunities through the reversionary bonuses which was a critical differentiator.

After the profile of consumers buying into these plans were
seen, the plans were made flexible after a period and linked to particular
life stages - need states. Top ups were allowed.
Value Proposition 2: Insurance as
an Investment Instrument
These were whole life and unit linked money back policies.
The Maximizing Life Policy was expected to increase the value
of money in the future. It was positioned as a policy that would generate
a surplus for investment. This was aimed across board, but was liked especially
by the sophisticates as well as the defensive buyers segment. In this
policy a proportion of the money would be paid back at regular intervals
of 4, 8, 12 and 16 years.

Segmented Plans: Mutations of this
Policy
For the Young Cosmopolitans, NeoPhytes and the Sophisticates,
unit linked policies were launched. Usually unit plans were launched internationally
only when the market was at a mature phase - however, in India the signals
were very positive for their launch.
The Freedom Plan enabled consumers to create wealth through
regular and relatively higher returns.
Every five years, a proportion (25%) of the amount accrued
was paid up.
The Future Perfect Plan provided for maintenance of lifestyle
after retirement in the form of annuities after regular payouts in the
interim.
There were opportunities of higher returns like mutual funds
and with the risk cover.
The premium was flexible and so were the top up options.
The critical differentiator of this plan is the complete
flexibility and the attractive amounts that it pays back at regular intervals.
Value Proposition 3: Insurance as
an Angel of mercy
These policies were called 'Fulfilling Life' and envisaged
periodic returns to meet monetary contingencies to create a good fund
at retirement.
The differentiator of this policy was that it could be customized
in combination with three terms to meet a person’s responsibilities at
different life stages. Besides, the risk cover was available up to 85
years.

Some of these policies were innovatively aimed at the High
Net Worth Segment (Powering Life Plan) where the premium was high and
the plan tenure only for a short duration.
However, a quarter of the premium paid was available at regular
intervals!
Value Proposition 4: Insurance as
a hedge against Old Age
These policies are aimed at the Defensive Customers and the
Pension Savers. 'Best years’ Retirement Plans offer a capital guarantee
and complete flexibility on payment options.
The critical differentiator that was developed was the minimum
guaranteed return. The returns announced on this plan this year is 8%
(double the interest on bank deposits).

Stage 4. Innovation and Customer Retention
Success Factors: Customer cross selling
and bundling, and amoebic mutations of policies.
The company has revolutionized transparency by organizing
all the terms and conditions behind the policy document so that consumers
do not worry about "fine print". This has created a feeling of trust among
consumers.
A few of the innovations made were based on specific needs
at certain life stages. Consumers are often migrated to these newer policies.
The Conquering Life Critical Illness Plan was introduced
as a response to a stated need of consumers.
The differentiator here is clearly different in the number
of illnesses it includes and is the only policy that pays 50% of the sum
assured on diagnosis and the other 50% in the recuperative stage.
Creating Life - Child Plan
This was a pioneering plan introduced as a method of planning
for time based expenditure to be incurred on children. The maturity benefit
could be received as a single lump sum payment or in three to five annual
installments at specific stages of the child.
The critical differentiator of this plan was that it provided
money for the child’s future with risk coverage of the parent as opposed
to the parent receiving the money in case of any eventuality!
"Market of One"
In order to ensure loyalty to the company, plans are afoot
to 'catch them young' and create customized plans at various stages and
catering to their need states. The Universal Life Plan is on the cards.
Also bouquets of individual plans are on the anvil.
Unlike other categories, customer retention in the insurance
business is largely influenced by 'management of orphan policies', i.e.
policies that have been commenced by inactive advisors. The company has
begun a huge database monitoring exercise with annual statements / mailers
to the customers and updating their databases. This is also being used
for cross selling.
Service Delivery Pathways: Innovations
- Value builder: Keeping in mind the desire of the Young
Savvy customers, the company website has a analyzer which follows a
decision tree logic to calculate the amount of investment required in
various types of insurance for specific returns at various life stages.
This enables choice of the policies as well as premium, etc. This has
gained popularity among the Neophytes and Hi Net Worth Buyers!
- Tie-ups for reach and organic growth: To enable better reach
especially in the small towns, tie ups with banks have been established.
In order to penetrate the rural hinterland, ING Vysya has tied up with
Madras Fertilizers - a fertilizer company to offer insurance to farmers
and rural folk! This company has a high level of reach in this segment.
- Value 'makeover' of the advisors: A different class of advisors
- celebrity stockbrokers, chartered analysts/accountants; financial
consultants and the like have been enlisted as "evangelists". They bring
to the table a meshing of consumer apprehensions /FAQ's and financial
savvy. They are able to make meaningful contributions in the customization
of offerings.
CONCLUSIONS
The scenario today: 2005
Within a short span of four years the private players have
not only grown the category but also ratcheted up a modest market share
of 13%! The private players are estimated to achieve one-third of the
market share by 2008.

Future Possibilities
As consumers become more savvy and demanding, the major players
would now have to start consolidating and assessing their core 'ticket
to play' areas.
In order to maintain their edge, newer offerings based on
consumer needs as well as changing socio psychographics would need to
be introduced.
ING VYSYA has launched another study to understand future
directions and which of these core areas that it would need to concentrate
on and develop in future, namely:
- Wealth Management,
- Risk Coverage, or
- Financial Services.
The plans would largely be driven by the consumer preferences
in the new scenario.
REFERENCES
DATA SOURCES
NCAER Study. The Great Indian Middle Class.
Confederation of Indian Industry. Papers and reports 2003 /2004
Cases on Sociology. Oxford University Press. 2002
ARTICLES
Burroughs, James and Aric Rindfleisch. (2002). Materialism
and well being - A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer
Research.
Flur, Dorilska; Mendonca, Lenny and Patricia Nakache. (1997). Personal
Financial Services - A question of channels. McKinsey Quarterly, No 3.
McNamara, Paul; Weir, Janette and Alok Kshirsagar. (2001). A broadband
future for financial advise. McKinsey Quarterly.
Purushottaman, Roopa. (2003). Dreaming with BRICS. Goldman Sachs
report.
Sen, Amartya. (1998). How India has fared.
THE AUTHORS
YVDV Prasad, ING Vysys Life Insurance, India.
Vivek Bengani, ING Vysys Life Insurance, India,
Nayantara Chakravarthi
, Multi Dimensions
Research, India.